Table 28: Analysis by Intersection of Expected to Actual Crashes
Table 28. EB Analysis by Intersection of Expected to Actual Crashes for All Crashes, Injury Crashes and PDO Crashes
|
All Crashes |
Injury Crashes |
PDO Crashes |
||||||
RLC Intersection |
Frequency Change |
Annual Change |
Percent Change |
Frequency Change |
Annual Change |
Percent Change |
Frequency Change |
Annual Change |
Percent Change |
Academy & Wyoming |
+10 |
+5.2 |
+13.1 |
+1 |
0.5 |
+3.7 |
+9 |
+4.7 |
+18.4 |
Coors & Central |
+5 |
+2.5 |
+4.6 |
-8 |
-4.0 |
-22.2 |
+15 |
+7.5 |
+19.0 |
Central & Louisiana |
-7 |
-4.0 |
-15.2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-7 |
-4.0 |
-21.2 |
Central & Eubank |
+17 |
+9.7 |
+29.3 |
+4 |
+2.3 |
+33.3 |
+13 |
+7.4 |
+28.3 |
Coors & Ellison |
-4 |
-2.1 |
-5.3 |
-2 |
-1.0 |
-9.5 |
-2 |
-1.0 |
-3.7 |
Lomas & Wyoming |
-3 |
-1.8 |
-6.8 |
-5 |
-3.0 |
-55.6 |
+2 |
+1.2 |
+5.4 |
Lomas & Eubank |
-10 |
-5.5 |
-19.2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-10 |
-5.5 |
-25.6 |
Lomas & Juan Tabo |
+4 |
+1.4 |
+5.2 |
-6 |
-2.1 |
-28.6 |
+10 |
+3.5 |
+16.1 |
Menaul & Carlisle |
+5 |
+2.6 |
+11.1 |
+1 |
+0.5 |
+7.6 |
-5 |
-2.6 |
-15.6 |
Menaul & San Mateo |
+1 |
+0.4 |
+1.3 |
-8 |
-3.2 |
-32.0 |
+9 |
+3.6 |
+15.3 |
Menaul & Louisiana |
-17 |
-9.7 |
-30.9 |
-12 |
-6.9 |
-60.0 |
-5 |
-2.9 |
-14.3 |
Menaul & Wyoming |
-1 |
-0.4 |
-1.8 |
-5 |
-2.0 |
-29.4 |
+4 |
+1.6 |
+9.1 |
Coors & Montano |
+34 |
+15.1 |
24.8 |
+12 |
+5.3 |
+30.0 |
+23 |
+10.2 |
+23.7 |
Montgomery & Carlisle |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-1 |
-0.5 |
-9.1 |
+1 |
+0.5 |
+2.3 |
|
+25 |
+6.0 |
+10.6 |
-27 |
-6.5 |
-30.7 |
+53 |
+12.7 |
+30.2 |
|
-14 |
-5.4 |
-12.2 |
-8 |
-3.1 |
-27.6 |
-7 |
-2.7 |
-8.0 |
Montgomery & Eubank |
-31 |
-7.4 |
-18.7 |
-27 |
-6.5 |
-42.2 |
-4 |
-1.0 |
-4.0 |
Coors & Paseo |
+47 |
+16.6 |
+26.6 |
-1 |
-0.4 |
-2.0 |
+48 |
+17.0 |
+37.8 |
Jefferson & Paseo |
+37 |
+16.4 |
+26.7 |
+2 |
+0.9 |
+5.6 |
+36 |
+16.0 |
+35.0 |
Coors & Quail |
-24 |
-11.5 |
-25.8 |
-8 |
-3.8 |
-25.8 |
-16 |
-7.7 |
-25.8 |