Table 21: Difference of Average Crashes at Red Light Camera Intersections Since Installation Controlling for Exposure
Table 21. RLC Intersection Differences of Averages at Intersections Before and After Controlling for Exposure
|
|
Differences in Averages for Each Type of Crash (RLC Years – Pre-RLC Years) |
||||||
|
Intersection |
Pre Count |
Post Count |
Total |
Injury |
PDO |
Rear End |
Angle |
|
Academy & Wyoming |
66 |
76 |
0.45 |
0.05 |
0.41 |
0.45 |
-0.32 |
|
Coors & Central |
113 |
107 |
-0.45 |
-0.66 |
0.20 |
-0.61 |
-0.08 |
|
Central & Louisiana |
48 |
39 |
-0.83 |
-0.15 |
# -0.68 |
-0.19 |
-0.49 |
|
Central & Eubank |
40 |
58 |
* 1.00 |
0.22 |
# 0.78 |
0.61 |
0.33 |
|
Coors & Ellison |
76 |
71 |
-0.53 |
-0.17 |
-0.36 |
-0.49 |
-0.13 |
|
Lomas & Wyoming |
42 |
41 |
-0.52 |
-0.38 |
-0.14 |
-0.61 |
0.19 |
|
Lomas & Eubank |
51 |
42 |
-0.43 |
0.00 |
-0.43 |
0.29 |
-0.24 |
|
Lomas & Juan Tabo |
72 |
77 |
0.32 |
-0.16 |
0.47 |
# 0.53 |
# -0.36 |
|
Menaul & Carlisle |
43 |
40 |
0.20 |
0.11 |
0.09 |
0.48 |
-0.05 |
|
Menaul & San Mateo |
76 |
76 |
-0.19 |
# -0.38 |
0.18 |
-0.01 |
-0.06 |
|
Menaul & Louisiana |
56 |
38 |
# -0.80 |
* -0.58 |
-0.22 |
-0.53 |
-0.24 |
|
Menaul & Wyoming |
54 |
56 |
0.08 |
-0.16 |
0.24 |
0.28 |
# -0.32 |
|
Coors & Montano |
109 |
137 |
0.53 |
0.19 |
0.34 |
0.60 |
-0.13 |
|
Montgomery & Carlisle |
53 |
53 |
0.40 |
0.04 |
0.37 |
# 0.66 |
# -0.39 |
|
|
215 |
236 |
0.33 |
* -0.62 |
** 0.95 |
0.18 |
-0.10 |
|
|
117 |
101 |
-0.52 |
-0.26 |
-0.26 |
-0.35 |
-0.06 |
|
Montgomery & Eubank |
175 |
135 |
* -0.72 |
** -0.65 |
-0.10 |
-0.32 |
* -0.40 |
|
Coors & Paseo |
130 |
177 |
* 1.38 |
-0.03 |
** 1.41 |
** 1.50 |
# -0.26 |
|
Jefferson & Paseo |
106 |
139 |
# 1.07 |
-0.05 |
* 1.12 |
* 1.17 |
-0.21 |
|
Coors & Quail |
98 |
69 |
* -1.16 |
-0.40 |
* -0.76 |
0.08 |
***-0.88 |
Note: #>.1, *>.05, **>.01, ***>.001
